Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:54:26 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, mbligh@google.com,
       thockin@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] softlockup: decouple hung tasks check from
	softlockup detection
Message-ID: <20090114105426.GH2913@elte.hu>
References: <20090112090307.GC26750@elte.hu> <20090112175803.GA3797@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090112175803.GA3797@google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 840
Lines: 27


* Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote:
> > Looks good in principle, but i suspect your patch submission should 
> > include the new kernel/hung_task.c file too ;-)
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> 
> Doh. Thanks for reviewing. Here is the same patch with hung_task.c included.

this now conflicts with the softlockup-panic fix you posted - and that fix 
has to go first as it's v2.6.29 material. (while the decoupling patch is 
2.6.30 material)

So could you please send a patch against tip/master:

  http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/