Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762309AbZANMS4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:18:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757039AbZANMSf (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:18:35 -0500 Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.30]:46846 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756384AbZANMSe (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:18:34 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Y/7toCgDujZpmFSvcrT5VtbOKHHMP40k7JjqDmlNbOOkuemzOh3WwPrgxdgy8fBfK5 rIGOu/yPWLNvKhJcHGBXihudLDBoFkMLf0HPAWH0mIK1/rh+wuattCjjXzpVrDXFsmlM bPhj8mXElnknewVf/ygRmxFrf5oXehntHhYjs= Message-ID: <28c262360901140418y242586cekd1c3220c2f4336a3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:18:32 +0900 From: "MinChan Kim" To: "Alan Cox" Subject: Re: lowmemory android driver not needed? Cc: "Pavel Machek" , "Greg KH" , "Arve Hj?nnev?g" , "Brian Swetland" , arve@google.com, "San Mehat" , "Robert Love" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "KOSAKI Motohiro" , "Rik van Riel" In-Reply-To: <20090114104834.18387fca@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20090114010223.GA21380@kroah.com> <20090114021801.GA14759@bulgaria.corp.google.com> <20090114035237.GB16442@kroah.com> <20090114104307.GA20451@elf.ucw.cz> <20090114104834.18387fca@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1705 Lines: 47 Last time, it seems my mail is lost. My mail is mangled by web mail(gmail) which change my mail's base encoding type. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Alan Cox wrote: >> > Alan, does this sound like it should remain in the tree? >> >> Maybe our oom killer should get a new tunable, telling it how >> aggressive it should be, instead? > > I was thinking that, and it would integrate better with the OLPC work > (which IMHO is a nicer interface for some stuff) > > You'd want two thresholds > > The 'arghhhh....' point where you start killing stuff > The 'uh oh...' point where an OLPC style low memory notifier kicks in > > (OLPC's model is a handle you can select/poll for 'memory getting low' so > apps can respond to pressure by doing stuff like dumping caches) I guess OLPC model is similar to mem_notify. Last year, Kosaki-san made mem_notify patch series. It may help this situation. http://lwn.net/Articles/268732/ > The rest ought to follow naturally IFF you can find a clean efficient way > to measure that pressure and quantify it as a number. Our default would > be like now, the Android default might be to trigger earlier.. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- Kinds regards, MinChan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/