Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762473AbZANNRF (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:17:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755365AbZANNQy (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:16:54 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.125]:50369 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753769AbZANNQx (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:16:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:16:50 -0500 (EST) From: Steven Rostedt X-X-Sender: rostedt@gandalf.stny.rr.com To: Joe Perches cc: Paul Mundt , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] MAINTAINERS - Add FTRACE git In-Reply-To: <1231913987.30095.11.camel@localhost> Message-ID: References: <1231878498-25171-1-git-send-email-joe@perches.com> <1231878498-25171-9-git-send-email-joe@perches.com> <20090114055954.GA7039@linux-sh.org> <1231913987.30095.11.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2448 Lines: 67 On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 14:59 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:28:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches > > > --- > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > index ceeeb8c..6e051c3 100644 > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -2189,6 +2189,7 @@ F: fs/freevxfs/ > > > FTRACE > > > P: Steven Rostedt > > > M: rostedt@goodmis.org > > > +T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git > > > S: Maintained > > > F: Documentation/ftrace.txt > > > F: arch/*/*/*/ftrace.h > > > > This sort of thing only makes sense if you include the topic branch for > > the tree in question. While it is true that ftrace development happens in > > this tree, people looking at ftrace may not want to sort through the > > hundreds of unrelated topic branches in the process. I say this as > > someone that does not want to sort through hundreds of unrelated topic > > branches in search of ftrace code ;-) > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=heads > > Is the correct topic branch for ftrace auto-ftrace-next? That is just a location that Ingo places changes that are ready to go to linux-next. Not where development is. > > maybe: > > T: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git auto-ftrace-next > > No idea what's right here. I had some private emails > with Steven Rostedt about a git tree. He suggested > to use tip. > > Steven? Suggestions? Ingo usually pulls ftrace related patches into the tracing/ftrace branch. That is for core ftrace. Since ftrace has a bunch of pluggins, they may have their own branches. But to answer Paul's question, I would suggest tracing/ftrace for seeing latest core ftrace changes. Should we add another topic in MAINTAINERS? The "TRACE RING BUFFER"? or just call it ring_buffer? This is separate from ftrace, although ftrace uses it for on the fly tracing. I maintain it and it is located in the tip git repo under tracing/ring-buffer. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/