Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762603AbZANNuA (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:50:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754796AbZANNtu (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:49:50 -0500 Received: from smtp19.orange.fr ([80.12.242.18]:5261 "EHLO smtp19.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754635AbZANNtt (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:49:49 -0500 X-ME-UUID: 20090114134948166.289611C0009E@mwinf1923.orange.fr Subject: Re: linux kernel without file system From: Xavier Bestel To: Kay Sievers Cc: Philippe De Muyter , Tomasz Chmielewski , LKML In-Reply-To: References: <496DA678.1090701@wpkg.org> <20090114093422.GA9771@frolo.macqel> <1231926744.11907.12.camel@skunk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:49:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1231940972.11907.49.camel@skunk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2012 Lines: 45 Oh yes sorry, I mixed that with the dev entry in sysfs, which contains the device major:minor in textual form (e.g. /sys/block/fd0/dev). Confused memory ... Xav On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:34 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:52, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 10:34 +0100, Philippe De Muyter wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:46:48AM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > >> >> I need to design a very small embedded system that must only control > >> >> one ethernet port and two serial lines and must fit in a very small flash > >> >> memory. So I thought about replacing the call to /etc/init by my > >> >> application > >> >> program and removing all the file-system part of linux. > >> >> Is that doable ? > >> >> Is there a 'standard' way of doing that ? > >> >> The first problem I see is accessing my serial lines. How could I do that > >> >> without using open("/dev/ttySx"), which requires a file system ? > >> >> Is there a way to access devices that does not require a file-system ? > >> > > >> > You could put everything in initramfs (and embed it in the kernel). > >> > >> Actually, I was thinking about reducing the footprint of my kernel by > >> removing all the fs-related system calls, so the problem is not where > >> the file-system is, but how to access (serial) devices without giving their > >> "/dev/..." name. > > > > You can still mount sysfs somewhere and access the device nodes from > > there. > > There are no device nodes in sysfs to talk to the device, only > attributes, which are mostly plain small text files. For some devices > there are a few writable and mappable files which can change the > device's state, but that's nothing like a device node. > > Kay > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/