Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:25:31 +0100
Message-ID: <s5hiqoh7t38.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Kyle McMartin <kyle@infradead.org>
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: kzalloc mod->ref
In-Reply-To: <20090114155859.GO25103@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20090114033533.GL25103@bombadil.infradead.org>
	<s5hmydufe3c.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<20090114155859.GO25103@bombadil.infradead.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.12.0 (Your Wildest Dreams) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)
 FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3
 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1736
Lines: 48

At Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:58:59 -0500,
Kyle McMartin wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:09:59AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:35:33 -0500,
> > Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > > 
> > > From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > Dynamically allocate mod->ref instead of fixing it in the struct module.
> > > Reduces on disk space wasted in the module .ko, and kills a loop
> > > initializing the local_t it contains since we can just kzalloc it.
> > > 
> > > This matters when we're talking about large NR_CPUS.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > The patch removing cacheline_aligned from struct module_ref should be
> > > applied as well to cut down on the amount of memory we allocate. This
> > > patch makes a nice stopgap until we have per_cpu module references.
> > > 
> > > cheers, Kyle
> > 
> > Similar patches (including mine) have been already posted, but no
> > proceed until now...
> > 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/11/315
> 
> Ah, sigh.
> 
> It would be nice to get this sorted out, since we're serious wasting
> disk space for no good reason...
> 
> Although as Richard points out, dropping the cacheline_aligned might
> drop networking performance (which, sigh, is also stupid) but allocating
> 128b * NR_CPUS is just a ridiculous amount of memory to waste for a
> reference count...

We can use nr_cpu_ids instead of NR_CPUS.
For a machine like 4096 CPUs, such an amount of memory is like a
peanut :)


Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/