Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763630AbZANR13 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:27:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761974AbZANR1T (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:27:19 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:55400 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761024AbZANR1S (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:27:18 -0500 Message-ID: <496E2059.8010904@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:26:49 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Theodore Tso , Eric Sandeen , Jan Kara , Arthur Jones , Andrew Morton , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , "sct@redhat.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3: wait on all pending commits in ext3_sync_fs References: <4908C951.2000309@redhat.com> <20081103184426.GA31894@ajones-laptop.nbttech.com> <20081103113318.35b0c266.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081103201428.GB30565@ajones-laptop.nbttech.com> <20081218231707.GB20092@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <496D1233.2060905@redhat.com> <20090114042402.GH14730@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090114042402.GH14730@mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1128 Lines: 30 Theodore Tso wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:14:11PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> This looks sane to me, and it does fix the below testcase. >> >> Care to formally propose it? > > Can we confirm what is being proposed? From following this thread, I > think what folks are suggesting is: > > 1) Revert the current "ext3/4: wait on all pending ocmmits in ext3/4_sync_fs" > > 2) Apply Jan's patch "jbd[2]: Fix return value of journal_start_commit()" The above seems like the right plan to me. It should address the kernel.org bug about IO on idle partitions. > 3) Also apply Jan's patch "jbd2: Skip commit of a transaction without > any buffers" since it appears to be a good optimization (although it's > not clear it would happen once we revert (1), above. Maybe not yet, it could probably use more testing/review/soak. -Eric > - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/