Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 14:58:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 14:58:29 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:22612 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 14:58:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 20:27:28 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Rik van Riel Cc: Alexander Viro , Linus Torvalds , Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, Tigran Aivazian , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: corruption Message-ID: <20001129202728.A811@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20001129195630.A6006@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 05:05:20PM -0200 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 05:05:20PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > To be honest, I have a big problem with micro optimisations > that prevent the big optimisations from happening. > > Would it be an idea to explicitly comment such dangerous > micro optimisations so people implementing the big optimisations > later on won't run into nasty surprises? Did you read the code we're talking about? Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/