Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765492AbZANRkx (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:40:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765389AbZANRkl (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:40:41 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:34711 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756955AbZANRkk (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:40:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:39:18 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Joerg Roedel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, netdev@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] dma-debug: add hash functions for dma_debug_entries Message-Id: <20090114093918.e7b0ae46.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090114114347.GG8625@elte.hu> References: <1231517970-20288-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1231517970-20288-4-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <20090113005118.82f5037b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090114114347.GG8625@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1245 Lines: 33 On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:43:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:19:17 +0100 Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > > > +struct hash_bucket { > > > + struct list_head list; > > > + spinlock_t lock; > > > +} ____cacheline_aligned; > > > > __cacheline_aligned_in_smp. > > > > This all looks like an exotically large amount of code for a debug > > thingy? > > this code checks the DMA usage of ~1 million lines of kernel code - all > the DMA using drivers. I think Joerg's feature is hugely relevant as DMA > scribbles are one of the hardest to debug kernel bugs: they can end up in > permanent data corruption or other hard to find bugs. In fact i think his > patchset is rather simple and even having 10 times as much debug code > would pay for its existence in the long run. > Have we previously found bugs by other means which this facility would have detected? I don't recall any... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/