Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757939AbZANUP2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:15:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754316AbZANUPG (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:15:06 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:38355 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752650AbZANUPE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:15:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:14:35 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Morton Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ghaskins@novell.com, matthew@wil.cx, andi@firstfloor.org, chris.mason@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, npiggin@suse.de, pmorreale@novell.com, SDietrich@novell.com, dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] adaptive spinning mutexes Message-ID: <20090114201435.GA6519@elte.hu> References: <1231863710.7141.3.camel@twins> <1231864854.7141.8.camel@twins> <1231867314.7141.16.camel@twins> <1231952436.14825.28.camel@laptop> <20090114183319.GA18630@elte.hu> <20090114105300.66bd014d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090114190008.GA13203@elte.hu> <20090114113638.c818fcf8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090114113638.c818fcf8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1837 Lines: 54 * Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:00:08 +0100 > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:33:19 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > Please pull the adaptive-mutexes-for-linus git tree > > > > > > > > > > > > - It seems a major shortcoming that the feature is disabled if > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y. It means that lots of people won't test it. > > ^^^? > > > > - When people hit performance/latency oddities, it would be nice if > > > they had a /proc knob with which they could disable this feature at > > > runtime. > > > > > > This would also be useful for comparative performance testing. > > > > Yeah. From my other mail: > > > > > > We still have the /sys/debug/sched_features tunable under > > > > CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y, so should this cause any performance regressions > > > > somewhere, it can be pinned down and blamed back on this change > > > > easily, without bisection and without rebooting the box. > > > > This kind of easy knob was included early on - this is how all those spin > > versus no-spin numbers were done. > > Do people enable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG? If they suspect performance problems and want to analyze them? Note that CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y is also the default. > CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=n, CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y is getting to be a pretty > small subset? Those two are the default config settings actually, so i'd expect it to be the most commonly occuring combinations. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/