Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759463AbZANUqI (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:46:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756656AbZANUpu (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:45:50 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:55196 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755402AbZANUps (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:45:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:44:36 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ghaskins@novell.com, matthew@wil.cx, andi@firstfloor.org, chris.mason@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, npiggin@suse.de, pmorreale@novell.com, SDietrich@novell.com, dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] adaptive spinning mutexes Message-Id: <20090114124436.9ac29330.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090114202736.GB6519@elte.hu> References: <1231863710.7141.3.camel@twins> <1231864854.7141.8.camel@twins> <1231867314.7141.16.camel@twins> <1231952436.14825.28.camel@laptop> <20090114183319.GA18630@elte.hu> <20090114105300.66bd014d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090114190008.GA13203@elte.hu> <20090114113638.c818fcf8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1231962650.14825.55.camel@laptop> <20090114202736.GB6519@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1252 Lines: 34 On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:27:36 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:36 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > Do people enable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG? > > > > Well, I have it always enabled, but I've honestly no idea if that makes > > me weird. > > > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=n, CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y is getting to be a pretty > > > small subset? > > > > Could be, do you fancy me doing a sysctl? shouldn't be hard. > > i dunno, why another fancy sysctl for something that fits quite nicely > into the existing sched_features scheme that we've been using for such > purposes for the past 3-4 kernel releases? > > we always provided various toggles for new scheduler features via > /sys/debug/sched_features, so that people can do performance regression > testing, and it works quite well. > If we know that this control will be reliably available in packaged kernels then fine. But how to we arrange for that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/