Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758267AbZANWek (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:34:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755596AbZANWeV (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:34:21 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:55410 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755339AbZANWeT (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:34:19 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: kenneth johansson Subject: Re: 2.6.27.8 scheduler bug - threads not being scheduled for long periods Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20090105175641.GA17055@sgi.com> <49625519.4050902@novell.com> <20090105185111.GA18084@sgi.com> <49625894.3090706@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 1-1-4-20a.ras.sth.bostream.se User-Agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1798 Lines: 46 On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:59:32 -0500, Gregory Haskins wrote: > Dimitri Sivanich wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:44:41PM -0500, Gregory Haskins wrote: >> >>> Dimitri Sivanich wrote: >>> >>>> I'm wondering if anyone else has run into this problem, and whether >>>> they've found a resolution for it? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Hi Dimitri, >>> I have observed similar problems on my opensuse 11.0 box (2.6.25 >>> based) when doing kernel builds. Often times other apps will get >>> starved (like firefox, etc). I was talking to peterz about it and he >>> pointed me at a commit that went into 28-rcx that fixes this (the sha >>> escapes me at the moment). I've been meaning to pull the patch into >>> our 2.6.25 and 2.6.27 trees to verify if it fixes it, but I have >>> fairly high confidence it will. Perhaps Peter can point you at the >>> same patch and you can give it a whirl. For the time being, can you >>> see if 28 is fixed? >>> >>> >>> >> 2.6.28 appears to be a little bit worse, actually: >> >> > Ugg...ok, well thanks for verifying. I will defer to Peter and Ingo on > this one. > > Please keep me in the loop on any new findings here, as the problem > (assuming its the same bug) has been annoying me for months (but > obviously not enough for me to do something about it ;) > > -Greg Could this be the same issue as we have in this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/276476 did anyone have a pointer to the patch ?? I'm on .28 and it's much much better but still not 100%. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/