Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757457AbZANWfV (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:35:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754910AbZANWe4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:34:56 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:49472 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753737AbZANWez (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:34:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:34:08 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Kay Sievers Cc: Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ghaskins@novell.com, matthew@wil.cx, andi@firstfloor.org, chris.mason@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, npiggin@suse.de, pmorreale@novell.com, SDietrich@novell.com, dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] adaptive spinning mutexes Message-ID: <20090114223408.GA19173@elte.hu> References: <20090114105300.66bd014d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090114190008.GA13203@elte.hu> <20090114113638.c818fcf8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090114201435.GA6519@elte.hu> <20090114123017.9acf42d7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090114205122.GC6519@elte.hu> <20090114130642.cf2b18b2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090114211458.GD6519@elte.hu> <20090114214158.GA9992@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1231 Lines: 42 * Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 22:41, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > >> > You just disproved your own case :( > >> > >> how so? 80% is not enough? I also checked Fedora and it has > >> SCHED_DEBUG=y in its kernel rpms. > > > > Ubuntu has CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y as well in their kernels. > > $ cat /etc/SuSE-release > openSUSE 11.1 (x86_64) > VERSION = 11.1 > > $ uname -a > Linux nga 2.6.27.7-9-default #1 SMP 2008-12-04 18:10:04 +0100 x86_64 > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > $ zgrep SCHED_DEBUG /proc/config.gz > CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y > > $ zgrep DEBUG_MUTEX /proc/config.gz > # CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is not set Fedora has mutex debugging disabled too: # CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is not set So the 3 main Linux distros, generating ~95% of the kerneloops.org feedback traffic, all have SCHED_DEBUG=y, and at least two have !DEBUG_MUTEXES. (possibly Ubuntu has that disabled it too) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/