Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760135AbZAODZf (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:25:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753101AbZAODZ1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:25:27 -0500 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:34456 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752710AbZAODZ0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:25:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:24:16 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Daisuke Nishimura , LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Pavel Emelyanov , Li Zefan , Paul Menage Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/4] memcg: don't call res_counter_uncharge when obsolete Message-Id: <20090115122416.e15d88a7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090114135539.GA21516@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20090113184533.6ffd2af9.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090114175121.275ecd59.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090114135539.GA21516@balbir.in.ibm.com> Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1470 Lines: 46 On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:25:39 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > * Daisuke Nishimura [2009-01-14 17:51:21]: > > > This is a new one. Please review. > > > > === > > From: Daisuke Nishimura > > > > mem_cgroup_get ensures that the memcg that has been got can be accessed > > even after the directory has been removed, but it doesn't ensure that parents > > of it can be accessed: parents might have been freed already by rmdir. > > > > This causes a bug in case of use_hierarchy==1, because res_counter_uncharge > > climb up the tree. > > > > Check if the memcg is obsolete, and don't call res_counter_uncharge when obsole. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura > > I liked the earlier, EBUSY approach that ensured that parents could > not go away if children exist. IMHO, the code has gotten too complex > and has too many corner cases. Time to revisit it. > But I don't like -EBUSY ;) When rmdir() returns -EBUSY even if there are no (visible) children and tasks, our customer will take kdump and send it to me "please explain this kernel bug" I'm sure it will happen ;) -Kame > -- > Balbir > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/