Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758895AbZAOGZb (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752738AbZAOGZW (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:22 -0500 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:42593 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752401AbZAOGZU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:20 -0500 Message-ID: <496ED6BA.6060500@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:24:58 +0900 From: Kenji Kaneshige User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Jesse Barnes , Linux PCI , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] PCI PCIe portdrv: Fix allocation of interrupts References: <200901042346.42723.rjw@sisk.pl> <496D815E.8010107@jp.fujitsu.com> <200901141135.31165.rjw@sisk.pl> <200901141157.32720.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200901141157.32720.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1536 Lines: 36 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > [...] >>> I'm sorry but I don't understand what the problem is. >>> Do you mean pci_disable_msix() doesn't work on some platforms? >> No, I don't. It was just confusion on my side, sorry. >> >> Please have a look at the new version of the patch I sent yesterday >> (http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=123185510828181&w=4). > > BTW, in your patch the first dummy pci_enable_msix() allocates just one > vector, which means that the contents of both > msix_entries[idx_hppme].entry and msix_entries[idx_aer].entry will be the same, > if my reading of the spec (PCI 3.0 in this case) is correct. > > However, if the second pci_enable_msix() allocates two vectors, the contents of the > message number fields in the PCIE_CAPABILITIES_REG and PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS > registers may change as a result. > For MSI, the interrupt message number field may change if the Multiple Message Enable Field was changed. On the other hand, for MSI-X, I think the interrupt message number field is constant. This is what the "[...] For a given MSI-X implementation, the entry must remain constant. [...]" explains in PCI Express spec, I think. Thanks, Kenji Kaneshige -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/