Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761968AbZAOJzY (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:55:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756081AbZAOJzE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:55:04 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f31.google.com ([209.85.219.31]:39734 "EHLO mail-ew0-f31.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754179AbZAOJzB (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:55:01 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=yDUZQokwnIeiVHU0i2hohkS90T+lYGqdAZF5zXM548L/G6vuGkrhofH5rhmHRN8+8v 0AmRgM7uJJpT+bUG1WDzVkyg8Q1Ks3XM0i7SrLTkXn4qQaQ8aemExiwBH5+39M3AfmRD qgoEE3XUqKSgFqekrfDR7dRmYXxq1PpfCViw8= Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:54:54 +0000 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Badalian Vyacheslav Cc: Denys Fedoryschenko , Chris Caputo , Peter Zijlstra , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: deadlocks if use htb Message-ID: <20090115095454.GA5461@ff.dom.local> References: <20081010090426.GA6054@ff.dom.local> <496EE1D4.6010709@bigtelecom.ru> <20090115080921.GC4190@ff.dom.local> <200901151101.15397.denys@visp.net.lb> <20090115090650.GF4190@ff.dom.local> <496F04AB.2080705@bigtelecom.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496F04AB.2080705@bigtelecom.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 948 Lines: 21 On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:40:59PM +0300, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote: ... > Jarek, i easy can test patch 4 without 2+3 if it needed at heavy > production server. I use dynamic routing and if server crashed - traffic > go to another pc after few seconds. I not test it because you say that > its not needed if for me help 3+2. I apply it today and test at few servers. Yes, I thought it's so rare we can wait till 2.6.29, while you had this patched, and Denys seemed to not see it after changing his sever. But I have changed my mind after seeing Chris's report... I'm not sure if Peter would recomend something better yet, so I guess you could wait with this testing for his opinion. Thanks, Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/