Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936172AbZAOXG1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:06:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936520AbZAOXEO (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:04:14 -0500 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:1511 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936283AbZAOXEL (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:04:11 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:03:31 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: David Miller Cc: jarkao2@gmail.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, zbr@ioremap.net, dada1@cosmosbay.com, ben@zeus.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once Message-ID: <20090115230331.GB1123@1wt.eu> References: <20090113.232710.55011568.davem@davemloft.net> <20090114082630.GB16692@gondor.apana.org.au> <20090114085308.GB4234@ff.dom.local> <20090114.012919.117682429.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090114.012919.117682429.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6079 Lines: 181 On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 01:29:19AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > Therefore what I'll likely do is push Jarek's copy based cure, > and meanwhile we can brainstorm some more on how to fix this > properly in the long term. > > So, I've put together a full commit message and Jarek's patch > below. One thing I notice is that the silly skb_clone() done > by SKB splicing is no longer necessary. > > We could get rid of that to offset (some) of the cost we are > adding with this bug fix. > > Comments? David, please don't merge it as-is. I've just tried it and got an OOM in __alloc_pages_internal after a few seconds of data transfer. I'm leaving the patch below for comments, maybe someone will spot something ? Don't we need at least one kfree() somewhere to match alloc_pages() ? Regards, Willy -- > > net: Fix data corruption when splicing from sockets. > > From: Jarek Poplawski > > The trick in socket splicing where we try to convert the skb->data > into a page based reference using virt_to_page() does not work so > well. > > The idea is to pass the virt_to_page() reference via the pipe > buffer, and refcount the buffer using a SKB reference. > > But if we are splicing from a socket to a socket (via sendpage) > this doesn't work. > > The from side processing will grab the page (and SKB) references. > The sendpage() calls will grab page references only, return, and > then the from side processing completes and drops the SKB ref. > > The page based reference to skb->data is not enough to keep the > kmalloc() buffer backing it from being reused. Yet, that is > all that the socket send side has at this point. > > This leads to data corruption if the skb->data buffer is reused > by SLAB before the send side socket actually gets the TX packet > out to the device. > > The fix employed here is to simply allocate a page and copy the > skb->data bytes into that page. > > This will hurt performance, but there is no clear way to fix this > properly without a copy at the present time, and it is important > to get rid of the data corruption. > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller > > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c > index 5110b35..6e43d52 100644 > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c > @@ -73,17 +73,13 @@ static struct kmem_cache *skbuff_fclone_cache __read_mostly; > static void sock_pipe_buf_release(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, > struct pipe_buffer *buf) > { > - struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *) buf->private; > - > - kfree_skb(skb); > + put_page(buf->page); > } > > static void sock_pipe_buf_get(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, > struct pipe_buffer *buf) > { > - struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *) buf->private; > - > - skb_get(skb); > + get_page(buf->page); > } > > static int sock_pipe_buf_steal(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, > @@ -1334,9 +1330,19 @@ fault: > */ > static void sock_spd_release(struct splice_pipe_desc *spd, unsigned int i) > { > - struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *) spd->partial[i].private; > + put_page(spd->pages[i]); > +} > > - kfree_skb(skb); > +static inline struct page *linear_to_page(struct page *page, unsigned int len, > + unsigned int offset) > +{ > + struct page *p = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0); > + > + if (!p) > + return NULL; > + memcpy(page_address(p) + offset, page_address(page) + offset, len); > + > + return p; > } > > /* > @@ -1344,16 +1350,23 @@ static void sock_spd_release(struct splice_pipe_desc *spd, unsigned int i) > */ > static inline int spd_fill_page(struct splice_pipe_desc *spd, struct page *page, > unsigned int len, unsigned int offset, > - struct sk_buff *skb) > + struct sk_buff *skb, int linear) > { > if (unlikely(spd->nr_pages == PIPE_BUFFERS)) > return 1; > > + if (linear) { > + page = linear_to_page(page, len, offset); > + if (!page) > + return 1; > + } > + > spd->pages[spd->nr_pages] = page; > spd->partial[spd->nr_pages].len = len; > spd->partial[spd->nr_pages].offset = offset; > - spd->partial[spd->nr_pages].private = (unsigned long) skb_get(skb); > spd->nr_pages++; > + get_page(page); > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -1369,7 +1382,7 @@ static inline void __segment_seek(struct page **page, unsigned int *poff, > static inline int __splice_segment(struct page *page, unsigned int poff, > unsigned int plen, unsigned int *off, > unsigned int *len, struct sk_buff *skb, > - struct splice_pipe_desc *spd) > + struct splice_pipe_desc *spd, int linear) > { > if (!*len) > return 1; > @@ -1392,7 +1405,7 @@ static inline int __splice_segment(struct page *page, unsigned int poff, > /* the linear region may spread across several pages */ > flen = min_t(unsigned int, flen, PAGE_SIZE - poff); > > - if (spd_fill_page(spd, page, flen, poff, skb)) > + if (spd_fill_page(spd, page, flen, poff, skb, linear)) > return 1; > > __segment_seek(&page, &poff, &plen, flen); > @@ -1419,7 +1432,7 @@ static int __skb_splice_bits(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *offset, > if (__splice_segment(virt_to_page(skb->data), > (unsigned long) skb->data & (PAGE_SIZE - 1), > skb_headlen(skb), > - offset, len, skb, spd)) > + offset, len, skb, spd, 1)) > return 1; > > /* > @@ -1429,7 +1442,7 @@ static int __skb_splice_bits(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int *offset, > const skb_frag_t *f = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[seg]; > > if (__splice_segment(f->page, f->page_offset, f->size, > - offset, len, skb, spd)) > + offset, len, skb, spd, 0)) > return 1; > } > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/