Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:51:43 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
       ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       mhalcrow@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Ecryptfs-devel] [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a
 question
Message-Id: <20090115155143.e4509e7e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <496FC91C.10806@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <7471.1231827621@jrobl>
	<20090115150332.f72ad0f8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<496FC91C.10806@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 986
Lines: 31

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:39:08 -0600
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > I am puzzled by the current ecryptfs maintenance situation.
> > 
> 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/768122
> 
> The torch has been passed to me.  :)

yup, thanks.

> > I queued this for 2.6.30.  It could be bumped up for 2.6.29 (and even
> > backported to 2.6.28 and earlier) with suitable acks from the
> > maintainer(?)
> > 
> 
> The changes to ecryptfs_rmdir() are valid, but not the rest of the patch.
> 

OK, I'll drop my copy.  Please send something back at me sometime, with
indications about which kernel version(s) it should be merged into.

We should chase J.R.  for a Signed-off-by:, which was omitted from the
original patch.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/