Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758951AbZAPG4L (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:56:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753596AbZAPGzu (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:55:50 -0500 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:60071 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752205AbZAPGzt (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:55:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:55:47 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Nick Piggin Cc: Andrew Morton , netdev@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com, chinang.ma@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sharad.c.tripathi@intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, andi.kleen@intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, harita.chilukuri@intel.com, douglas.w.styner@intel.com, peter.xihong.wang@intel.com, hubert.nueckel@intel.com, chris.mason@oracle.com, srostedt@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com, anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com, "Zhang, Yanmin" Subject: Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Message-ID: <20090116065546.GJ31013@parisc-linux.org> References: <200901161503.13730.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20090115201210.ca1a9542.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200901161746.25205.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200901161746.25205.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1166 Lines: 26 On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 05:46:23PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > Intel's OLTP shows SLQB is "neutral" to SLAB. That is, literally within > their measurement confidence interval. If it comes down to it, I think we > could get them to do more runs to narrow that down, but we're talking a > couple of tenths of a percent already. I think I can speak with some measure of confidence for at least the OLTP-testing part of my company when I say that I have no objection to Nick's planned merge scheme. I believe the kernel benchmark group have also done some testing with SLQB and have generally positive things to say about it (Yanmin added to the gargantuan cc). Did slabtop get fixed to work with SLQB? -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/