Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760232AbZAPIVi (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:21:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753963AbZAPIV3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:21:29 -0500 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]:33743 "EHLO vms173003pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751343AbZAPIV2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:21:28 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:21:26 -0500 From: Gene Heskett Subject: 2.6.29-rc1 vs selinux To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Message-id: <200901160321.26749.gene.heskett@gmail.com> Organization: Organization? very little MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 952 Lines: 23 One of the things that was bugging me was that after having booted 2.6.29-rc1, rebooting to 2.6.28 final always caused an automatic relabel, which on this box with a bit over a terrabyte in drives, takes an extra 20 minutes to do. So I grepped the .config's and there is no mention of SELINUX in the output of a make oldconfig for 2.6.29-rc1, based on a 2.6.28 .config input. I see the security/selinux directory still exists in the src tree. Is this a kconfig bug, or is selinux outta here? Thanks. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Bushydo -- the way of the shrub. Bonsai! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/