Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759752AbZAPLAk (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:00:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757254AbZAPLAb (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:00:31 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:40210 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756953AbZAPLAa (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:00:30 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:00:29 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , Chuck Ebbert , Domenico Andreoli , Willy Tarreau , Rodrigo Rubira Branco , Jake Edge , Eugene Teo , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Heiko Carstens , jbenc@suse.cz Subject: Re: [patch 42/94] [PATCH 11/44] [CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 01 Message-ID: <20090116110029.GA28778@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20090115194806.804618825@mini.kroah.org> <20090115195848.GP14419@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090115195848.GP14419@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1175 Lines: 36 > 2.6.28-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > ------------------ > > From: Heiko Carstens > > commit 58fd3aa288939d3097fa04505b25c2f5e6e144d1 upstream. > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman That does not make review exactly easy. Would it be possible to inline upstream comment in the commit message? ...upstream commit message is empty :-(. > -asmlinkage long > -sys_nanosleep(struct timespec __user *rqtp, struct timespec __user *rmtp) > +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(nanosleep, struct timespec __user *, rqtp, > + struct timespec __user *, rmtp) > { > struct timespec tu; > Is it strictly neccessary to modify all the syscalls? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/