Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932777AbZAPMHW (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:07:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757842AbZAPMHA (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:07:00 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:46041 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756584AbZAPMG7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:06:59 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Simon Holm =?utf-8?q?Th=C3=B8gersen?= Subject: Re: regression: a0d4922 causes PCI host constroller problems Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:06:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.29-rc1-tst; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Alan Stern , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "linux-kernel" , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org References: <1232093125.2876.1.camel@odie.local> <1232097368.3120.5.camel@odie.local> In-Reply-To: <1232097368.3120.5.camel@odie.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901161306.10358.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1405 Lines: 35 On Friday 16 January 2009, Simon Holm Thøgersen wrote: > fre, 16 01 2009 kl. 09:05 +0100, skrev Simon Holm Thøgersen: > > commit a0d4922 ("USB: fix up suspend and resume for PCI host > > controllers") causes a lot of these two lines to be logged: > > > > uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.2: host system error, PCI problems? > > uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.2: host controller process error, something bad > > happened! > > > > Normally they appear on resume after suspend to disk, but sometimes I'm > > not even sure I had to suspend to disk to see them. Also, it seems like > > they don't trigger if X has not been started, or at least they are much > > less likely to. > > > > Reverting the patch restores normal operation. > > > > No USB devices were attached BTW. > > So this one has already been reported [1]. There was some mentioning of > a patch to try out instead of reverting, but I couldn't find it. > > Rafael, did you have something else to suggest or can we please get a > revert of this one upstream asap before too many are wasting their time > on this one? Yes, please try the patch from http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/144 and report back. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/