Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id <S131592AbQK2Vmk>; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:42:40 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
        id <S132011AbQK2Vma>; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:42:30 -0500
Received: from adsl-63-195-162-81.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.195.162.81]:41988
        "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id <S131592AbQK2VmR>; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:42:17 -0500
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 13:11:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
To: "Henning P . Schmiedehausen" <hps@tanstaafl.de>
cc: "Dr. Kelsey Hudson" <kernel@blackhole.compendium-tech.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fasttrak100 questions...
In-Reply-To: <20001129210830.J17523@forge.tanstaafl.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011291307471.1743-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> Anything else would mean that I can send E-Mail to Linus Torvalds
> every five minutes and request a verbatim copy of his current hacking
> kernel tree as it is under GPL, which he is the forced to give to me
> because of the GPL. This would be utter nonsense.

Ask me for the GPL code that I wrote as the author, that am working on at
the rates define.  I will tell you to go right to hell on a bobsled!
Oh and I will push to make sure you do not waste time getting there.

You are being a total ASS.

As the author of GPL code I have the right to pull the GPL if I wish and
never update or publish the updates, and YOU have not legal authority to
force me to send you SHIT!  Does that make it real clear or not?

Later,

Andre Hedrick
Linux ATA Development

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/