Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc1 vs selinux
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
In-Reply-To: <1232113900.13917.29.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <200901160321.26749.gene.heskett@gmail.com>
	 <1232113900.13917.29.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: National Security Agency
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:58:29 -0500
Message-Id: <1232114309.13917.32.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1222
Lines: 29

On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 08:51 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 03:21 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > One of the things that was bugging me was that after having booted 2.6.29-rc1, 
> > rebooting to 2.6.28 final always caused an automatic relabel, which on this 
> > box with a bit over a terrabyte in drives, takes an extra 20 minutes to do.
> > 
> > So I grepped the .config's and there is no mention of SELINUX in the output of 
> > a make oldconfig for 2.6.29-rc1, based on a 2.6.28 .config input.
> > 
> > I see the security/selinux directory still exists in the src tree.  Is this a 
> > kconfig bug, or is selinux outta here?
> 
> Can you post your .config file?
> selinux depends on SECURITY_NETWORK && AUDIT && NET && INET
> 
> (possibly it should be using select instead of depends?)

Never mind the last part, already tried and rejected:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0710.1/0530.html

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/