Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935030AbZAPOlT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:41:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756778AbZAPOlD (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:41:03 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:43751 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753272AbZAPOlB (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:41:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:43:04 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Heiko Carstens Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , Chuck Ebbert , Domenico Andreoli , Willy Tarreau , Rodrigo Rubira Branco , Jake Edge , Eugene Teo , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, jbenc@suse.cz Subject: Re: [patch 42/94] [PATCH 11/44] [CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 01 Message-ID: <20090116144304.GB1933@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20090115194806.804618825@mini.kroah.org> <20090115195848.GP14419@kroah.com> <20090116110029.GA28778@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20090116112435.GB27146@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090116112435.GB27146@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2212 Lines: 60 On Fri 2009-01-16 12:24:35, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:00:29PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > 2.6.28-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > From: Heiko Carstens > > > > > > commit 58fd3aa288939d3097fa04505b25c2f5e6e144d1 upstream. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > That does not make review exactly easy. Would it be possible to > > inline upstream comment in the commit message? > > > > ...upstream commit message is empty :-(. > > Yes, what should it contain anyway? > "This converts the first 10 system calls to the system call wrapper > infrastructure"? IMHO the subject says enough. "This converts the first 10 system calls to the system call wrapper infrastructure. This is neccessary because of . It is good idea to convert all syscalls and not only affected ones for uniformity." ....at the very least. > > > -asmlinkage long > > > -sys_nanosleep(struct timespec __user *rqtp, struct timespec __user *rmtp) > > > +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(nanosleep, struct timespec __user *, rqtp, > > > + struct timespec __user *, rmtp) > > > { > > > struct timespec tu; > > > > > > > Is it strictly neccessary to modify all the syscalls? > > Not strictly necessary, but much easier to maintain in the long term. > It's simply a just convert 'em all approach and never think again about > this. I believe we should go for minimal patch for -stable. This is really huge. > Plus the ugliness of the 64 bit parameter special case handling makes it > unlikely that we will ever have again a discussion how a new system call > should pass an loff_t. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/