Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1766016AbZAPQWE (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:22:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758094AbZAPQVv (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:21:51 -0500 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:57846 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757746AbZAPQVu (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:21:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow SysRq emergency sync to thaw frozen filesystems From: Dave Kleikamp To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, t-sato@yk.jp.nec.com In-Reply-To: <497003CC.8030503@redhat.com> References: <496EB639.6090800@redhat.com> <20090115162031.a512232b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <497003CC.8030503@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:21:47 -0600 Message-Id: <1232122907.15209.3.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1333 Lines: 37 On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 21:49 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:06:17 -0600 > > Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/char/sysrq.c > >> =================================================================== > >> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/char/sysrq.c > >> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/char/sysrq.c > >> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ static struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_reboot_ > >> > >> static void sysrq_handle_sync(int key, struct tty_struct *tty) > >> { > >> + emergency_thaw(); > >> emergency_sync(); > >> } > > > > Kind of weird. The thaw will happen after/during the sync(). > > oh, hrm. Maybe I didn't think enough about how it's handed off to > pdflush; I could rearrange if that makes sense? Or maybe handing to > pdflush is wrong, it was just so convenient.... I don't understand the reason for handing it to pdflush. I would expect thaw to be very fast. Do we expect it to block anywhere, and if so, for very long? Not that I see any problem with it. Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/