Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934121AbZAPQxo (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:53:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757319AbZAPQxc (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:53:32 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com ([209.85.218.21]:51442 "EHLO mail-bw0-f21.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755476AbZAPQxb (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:53:31 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=ffZR6e0oaVTpyopwlMlQmT8fe/HUHL+bewviw5Pgmm5+6qzkxOeB+v1DeQz1rgB0Nz Zd01BCmYC8/WFLNpKRCdru5ypuFWaRlaFHOaI/sT0jfiYyA0Yf9oArjtNl8F3i3dR6w5 j1MD5AX3iwfQFFSL4Qx+tPcl4D4RTlmBgcjoA= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 05:53:28 +1300 From: "Michael Kerrisk" Reply-To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com To: "Gerd Hoffmann" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add preadv & pwritev system calls. Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <1232124344-25892-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1232124344-25892-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1705 Lines: 52 Gerd, On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi folks, > > Next round of the preadv & pwritev patch series. Have you somewhere along the way posted some userland example/test programs for these syscalls? If not, could you provide some? Cheers, Michael > Had no review comments > to fix. That means it is ready to be merged, right? > > Changes: > - compat_sys_{read,write}v bugfix patch dropped (merged). > - rebase to latest git, adapt to CVE-2009-0029 changes. > > How to proceed now? Is there a syscall maintainer where I could queue > up the patches? If not, anyone (akpm?) willng to pick this up? Should > I try to send to Linus directly? > > What is the usual way to handle the arch-specific syscall windup? I'd > prefer to leave that to the arch maintainers as they know best what > needs to be done, is that ok? Right now only x86 (/me) and mips (patch > from Ralf Baechle) is covered ... > > cheers, > Gerd > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/