Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:57:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:56:51 -0500 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:9354 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:56:31 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:56:22 -0800 From: Richard Henderson To: David Howells Cc: Linus Torvalds , Roman Zippel , Jeff Garzik , davidm@hpl.hp.com, "David S. Miller" , anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch Message-ID: <20020215135622.B25047@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: David Howells , Linus Torvalds , Roman Zippel , Jeff Garzik , davidm@hpl.hp.com, "David S. Miller" , anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <23760.1013782075@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <23760.1013782075@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>; from dhowells@redhat.com on Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 02:07:55PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 02:07:55PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Should I move the convenience bit operations back to the arch header, so that > the M68K guys can have byte-sized flags (which they can use TAS/TST on)? If you provide some way to override the convenience bit operations, then I suspect that you can let most folks use the byte ops. It's only older alphas that would absolutely have to play games. Of course, I now have 9 flag bits defined, so I might not go back to bytes anyway... r~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/