Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935829AbZAPRxV (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:53:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761012AbZAPRxD (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:53:03 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.188]:52009 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758124AbZAPRxA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:53:00 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Gerd Hoffmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add preadv & pwritev system calls. Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:52:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com, Ulrich Drepper References: <1232124344-25892-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1232124344-25892-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901161852.04953.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/m+Ghs98ZN2y9a12nuAAvZqIdHOdxYNisjiaY kG3SszhOBKyqeK/7BgYh9sbdPn2aldrBaPiPZgDo9rycb8E5dR rV0i4MHsdVeqSoJZSbQIQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1644 Lines: 38 On Friday 16 January 2009, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Next round of the preadv & pwritev patch series. ?Had no review comments > to fix. ?That means it is ready to be merged, right? In general, getting no feedback does not mean something's ready ;-) Your patches look pretty polished though, and IIRC the only real objection was to whether or not the syscalls should be there in the first place. Did you get any feedback from Ulrich Drepper as to whether he plans to add support to glibc? > Changes: > ?- compat_sys_{read,write}v bugfix patch dropped (merged). > ?- rebase to latest git, adapt to CVE-2009-0029 changes. > > How to proceed now? ?Is there a syscall maintainer where I could queue > up the patches? ?If not, anyone (akpm?) willng to pick this up? ?Should > I try to send to Linus directly? > > What is the usual way to handle the arch-specific syscall windup? ?I'd > prefer to leave that to the arch maintainers as they know best what > needs to be done, is that ok? ?Right now only x86 (/me) and mips (patch > from Ralf Baechle) is covered ... I'd say get it into linux-next as a git tree, then let the arch maintainers send you the missing patches to hook up the syscalls so that it can go in as one chunk. Have you done the glibc patch already? You probably also need to provide an alternative user space implementation based on a pread/pwrite loop for older kernels. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/