Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:13:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:13:32 -0500 Received: from dsl254-112-233.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.112.233]:19 "EHLO golux.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:13:15 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:46:10 -0500 From: "Eric S. Raymond" To: Alan Cox Cc: Dave Jones , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Disgusted with kbuild developers Message-ID: <20020215164610.A14418@thyrsus.com> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com Mail-Followup-To: "Eric S. Raymond" , Alan Cox , Dave Jones , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020215155946.B14083@thyrsus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 09:47:03PM +0000 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox : > The prototype generates a very convincing table set, and the tables generate > very convincing graphs. The information to work out what option needs another > as I've said for months I've *solved* this problem. I understand the constraints. I know exactly what you will have to do to get the rest of the way, *because I did it*. I have built not just a "proof of concept" but a working implementation so robust that it is in production use by three different projects. And a substantial number of kernel developers are using it now and reporting it good. The good thing about working with developers like you and Dave Jones and many of the other loonies on this list is that you are fucking brilliant. The bad thing is that because you're fucking brilliant, you're often also ungodly arrogant about second-guessing other peoples' work -- you think your snap judgment or "proof of concept" is somehow equivalent to two years of design, coding and testing by someone who has been concentrating on the problem. News bulletin: IT'S NOT. Alan, don't talk to me about "proof of concept". Tell me about a production-quality system, proven in use by people like Embedsys, Webmachines, and the Compache project. Tell me you can duplicate what CML2 does successfully before you run around implying my design assumptions are full of crap. -- Eric S. Raymond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/