Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:53:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:52:56 -0500 Received: from Expansa.sns.it ([192.167.206.189]:52742 "EHLO Expansa.sns.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:52:49 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 00:48:32 +0100 (CET) From: Luigi Genoni To: Benny Sjostrand cc: David Lang , Robert Love , J Sloan , john slee , J Sloan , Subject: Re: tux officially in kernel? In-Reply-To: <3C6D7F19.5060807@cucumelo.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am using it, for example, on some web site, and it works well, abnd rock solid. But on the internet, as it is today, it has no meaning to talk about speed performances. But the server are less stressed than with just apache. On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Benny Sjostrand wrote: > > > > > >Linus put khttpd in the kernel just after sendfile support was added, IIRC > >he said something about khttpd being a very small number of lines to add > >once sendfile support was there. > > > does anyone use the khttpd service for real today ?, is there > possibility making some useful stuff of it ? , interface it with apache > getting better performance or whatever ... > > /Benny > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/