Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:55:30 -0600
From: "Bill O'Donnell" <billodo@sgi.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
       Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [XFS] Update maintainers
Message-ID: <20090118185530.GA1857@sgi.com>
References: <200901150459.n0F4xhVS016322@hera.kernel.org> <1232058936.3109.7.camel@localhost> <20090116010511.GA33559@sgi.com> <1232297538.5204.20.camel@laptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1232297538.5204.20.camel@laptop>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 784
Lines: 19

On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 05:52:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
| On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 19:05 -0600, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
| > No, I'd prefer we keep the maintainer contact address 
| > as a centralized SGI mail address.  In fact, it would be 
| > best if we remove my name entirely, and leave contact 
| > completely centralized to SGI.
| 
| Do I read this as nobody wanting to be personally responsible for XFS
| anymore?

No, you're misunderstanding. Rather than a single POC, there are 
multiple contacts inside SGI, devoted to XFS.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/