Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758843AbZASGPA (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:15:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756216AbZASGOq (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:14:46 -0500 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:1600 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755960AbZASGOp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:14:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:14:20 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: David Miller Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, jarkao2@gmail.com, zbr@ioremap.net, dada1@cosmosbay.com, ben@zeus.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once Message-ID: <20090119061420.GB12946@1wt.eu> References: <20090115.155434.206643894.davem@davemloft.net> <20090119004206.GA10396@1wt.eu> <20090119030844.GA31941@gondor.apana.org.au> <20090118.192719.198405397.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090118.192719.198405397.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1411 Lines: 36 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 07:27:19PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Herbert Xu > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:08:44 +1100 > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:42:06AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > > > Just for the record, I've now re-integrated those changes in a test kernel > > > that I booted on my 10gig machines. I have updated my user-space code in > > > haproxy to run a new series of tests. Eventhough there is a memcpy(), the > > > results are EXCELLENT (on a C2D 2.66 GHz using Myricom's Myri10GE NICs) : > > > > > > - 4.8 Gbps at 100% CPU using MTU=1500 without LRO > > > (3.2 Gbps at 100% CPU without splice) > > > > One thing to note is that Myricom's driver probably uses page > > frags which means that you're not actually triggering the copy. So does this mean that the corruption problem should still there for such a driver ? I'm asking before testing, because at these speeds, validity tests are not that easy ;-) > Right. > > And this is also the only reason why jumbo MTU worked :-) What should we expect from other drivers with jumbo frames ? Hangs, corruption, errors, packet loss ? Thanks, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/