Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756868AbZASIrk (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:47:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752888AbZASIr2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:47:28 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:61510 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751520AbZASIr1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:47:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=be+CYLKsVuUF0SIXUOX16YZ0CiJ7b8x5PzlDVzfrCbbVCAwEcTWIDboBKVrP/Ux6sH bY9WgLx1S8VcFcQxjKrR41E1/TSIeiynLKh58lVt3wIBVfIqdblBwppKII6kIt8Jvu1B 2faAITmGfFc3/a4UrtJg+PI6gIFYivKRnGAls= Message-ID: <84144f020901190047v1f7f6710l5d4af50b57be3a7e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:47:24 +0200 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Nick Piggin" Subject: Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Cc: "Matthew Wilcox" , "Andrew Morton" , "Wilcox, Matthew R" , chinang.ma@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sharad.c.tripathi@intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, andi.kleen@intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, harita.chilukuri@intel.com, douglas.w.styner@intel.com, peter.xihong.wang@intel.com, hubert.nueckel@intel.com, chris.mason@oracle.com, srostedt@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Vasquez" , "Anirban Chakraborty" , "Christoph Lameter" In-Reply-To: <200901191942.48548.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1232352303.30141.25.camel@penberg-laptop> <200901191933.29322.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <200901191942.48548.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2412107b65ea1179 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 747 Lines: 15 On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Nick Piggin wrote: > Anyway, nobody has disagreed with my proposal to merge SLQB, so in the > worst case I don't think it will cause too much harm, and in the best > case it might turn out to make the best tradeoffs and who knows, it > might actually not be catastrophic for HPC ;) Yeah. If Andrew/Linus doesn't want to merge SLQB to 2.6.29, we can stick it in linux-next through slab.git if you want. Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/