Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759606AbZASLfw (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:35:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755777AbZASLfn (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:35:43 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:36715 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755268AbZASLfm (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:35:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:35:30 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Tejun Heo Cc: Brian Gerst , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu Message-ID: <20090119113530.GA13185@elte.hu> References: <1232296759-2253-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <73c1f2160901181651w3dff5e2co762b767168416c92@mail.gmail.com> <4973E938.4010408@kernel.org> <20090119111932.GC18996@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090119111932.GC18996@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1402 Lines: 39 * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Hello, Ingo, Brian. > > > > Brian Gerst wrote: > > > > > > Here are the remaining patches rebased on top of these. > > > > Ingo, here's git tree for kill-pda patches. > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git tj-percpu > > > > I dropped early irq_stack_ptr relocation from 0004. I'll post updated > > patch as reply to the original patch. If you think it's still > > necessary, please feel free to discuss it. I also added a patch to kill > > PERCPU_VADDR_PREALLOC(). Will post the patch as a reply to 0005. > > Pulled these commit into tip/core/percpu: hm, actually - the stackprotector impact is getting quite nasty. So i think we are better off by merging the stackprotector fixes into core/percpu, and then rebasing these commits on top of that. I pushed out a new core/percpu branch with that done - and stackprotector works in that lineup. Would you mind to redo these commits on top of that? I tried the conflict resolution but it looks quite complex and non-obvious - it would be cleaner to have it this way. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/