Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 04:06:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 04:06:19 -0500 Received: from duba03h03-0.dplanet.ch ([212.35.36.23]:61957 "EHLO duba03h03-0.dplanet.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 04:06:09 -0500 Message-ID: <3C6E20A8.40008@dplanet.ch> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 10:04:40 +0100 From: "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011023 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: esr@thyrsus.com, Dave Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Disgusted with kbuild developers In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > "Eric S. Raymond" wrote: > >>The first thing I heard, from mec two years ago, was "the CML1 code >>base is not salvageable". This was then and is now the unanimous opinion of >>the kbuild team. Not just mine; in fact, they concluded it before >>I entered the picture. >> >>I have seen nothing since to make me change that opinion. >> > > So Alan Cox's opinion counts as nothing? > mconfig counts as nothing? Why mconfig is not in the kernel? who maintain mconfig? Why the first maintainer of mconfig prefer CML2? > > I'm sure CML2 configurator is whiz-bang, but it needs to do basic stuff > like having "make oldconfig" work exactly like it does in the current > config system. now CML2 oldconfig behave like actual code. I would say too much. giacomo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/