Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753814AbZASNoA (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:44:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751530AbZASNns (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:43:48 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:60689 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751227AbZASNns (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:43:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4974838F.4020606@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:43:43 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Brian Gerst , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET x86:core/percpu] percpu: move PDA fields to percpu References: <1232296759-2253-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <73c1f2160901181651w3dff5e2co762b767168416c92@mail.gmail.com> <4973E938.4010408@kernel.org> <20090119111932.GC18996@elte.hu> <20090119113530.GA13185@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090119113530.GA13185@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1468 Lines: 40 Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> * Tejun Heo wrote: >> >>> Hello, Ingo, Brian. >>> >>> Brian Gerst wrote: >>>> Here are the remaining patches rebased on top of these. >>> Ingo, here's git tree for kill-pda patches. >>> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git tj-percpu >>> >>> I dropped early irq_stack_ptr relocation from 0004. I'll post updated >>> patch as reply to the original patch. If you think it's still >>> necessary, please feel free to discuss it. I also added a patch to kill >>> PERCPU_VADDR_PREALLOC(). Will post the patch as a reply to 0005. >> Pulled these commit into tip/core/percpu: > > hm, actually - the stackprotector impact is getting quite nasty. So i > think we are better off by merging the stackprotector fixes into > core/percpu, and then rebasing these commits on top of that. I pushed out > a new core/percpu branch with that done - and stackprotector works in that > lineup. > > Would you mind to redo these commits on top of that? I tried the conflict > resolution but it looks quite complex and non-obvious - it would be > cleaner to have it this way. Sure, will rebase and repost. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/