Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760609AbZATNAB (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:00:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754885AbZATM7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:59:51 -0500 Received: from ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net ([203.16.214.57]:3538 "EHLO ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754624AbZATM7u (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:59:50 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhICAAxXdUl5LBURgWdsb2JhbACUBQEBFiK2coVz X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,295,1231075800"; d="scan'208";a="288498822" Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:59:44 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: Eric Sesterhenn Cc: Pavel Machek , Chris Mason , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Warning and BUG with btrfs and corrupted image Message-ID: <20090120125944.GC10158@disturbed> Mail-Followup-To: Eric Sesterhenn , Pavel Machek , Chris Mason , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <20090113142147.GE16333@alice> <1231857643.29164.28.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20090113144307.GF16333@alice> <20090118174035.GG1944@ucw.cz> <20090120063150.GC5854@alice> <20090120101119.GB10158@disturbed> <20090120101503.GC17377@alice> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090120101503.GC17377@alice> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1175 Lines: 30 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote: > * Dave Chinner (david@fromorbit.com) wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:31:50AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote: > > > * Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz) wrote: > > > > Does ext2/3 and vfat survive that kind of attacks? Those are 'in > > > > production' and should survive it... > > > > > > I regularly (once or twice a week) test 100 corrupted images of > > > vfat, udf, msdos, swap, iso9660, ext2, ext3, ext4, minix, bfs, befs, > > > hfs, hfs+, qnx4, affs and cramfs on each of my two test machines. > > > > Any reason you are not testing XFS in that set? > > So far the responses from xfs folks have been disappointing, if you are > interested in bugreports i can send you some. Sure I am. It would be good if you could start testing XFS along with all the other filesystems and report anything you find. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/