Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761465AbZATOZ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:25:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755412AbZATOZo (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:25:44 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:47065 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755019AbZATOZn (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:25:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:25:15 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Kevin Shanahan Cc: Avi Kivity , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Mike Galbraith , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected) Message-ID: <20090120142515.GC10224@elte.hu> References: <1232410363.4768.21.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au> <20090120113546.GA26571@elte.hu> <1232455343.4895.4.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au> <20090120125652.GA1457@elte.hu> <1232461380.4895.33.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1232461380.4895.33.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2859 Lines: 66 * Kevin Shanahan wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Kevin Shanahan wrote: > > > > This suggests some sort of KVM-specific problem. Scheduler latencies > > > > in the seconds that occur under normal load situations are noticed and > > > > reported quickly - and there are no such open regressions currently. > > > > > > It at least suggests a problem with interaction between the scheduler > > > and kvm, otherwise reverting that scheduler patch wouldn't have made the > > > regression go away. > > > > the scheduler affects almost everything, so almost by definition a > > scheduler change can tickle a race or other timing bug in just about any > > code - and reverting that change in the scheduler can make the bug go > > away. But yes, it could also be a genuine scheduler bug - that is always a > > possibility. > > Okay, I understand. > > > Could you please run a cfs-debug-info.sh session on a CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y > > and CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS=y kernel, while you are experiencing those > > latencies: > > > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh > > > > and post that (relatively large) somewhere, or send it as a reply after > > bzip2 -9 compressing it? It will include a lot of information about the > > delays your tasks are experiencing. > > Running it while the problem is occuring will be tricky, as it only > lasts for a few seconds at a time. Is it going to be useful at all to > just see those statistics if the system is running normally? > > I might need to modify the script a little. Am I right that everything > above "gathering statistics..." is pretty much static information? Correct. > I could run top, vmstat and cat /proc/sched_debug in a loop until the > problem occurs and then trim it. Something like: > > while true; do > date >> $FILE > echo "-- top: --" >> $FILE > top -H -c -b -d 1 -n 0.5 >> $FILE 2>/dev/null > echo "-- vmstat: --" >> $FILE > vmstat >> $FILE 2>/dev/null > echo "-- sched_debug #$i: --" >> $FILE > cat /proc/sched_debug >> $FILE 2>/dev/null > done > > That should take a snapshot every half second or so. Yeah, that would be lovely. You dont even have to trim it much - just give us a timestamp to look at for the delay incident. You might also want to start the kvm session while the script is already running - that way we'll get fresh statistics and see the whole thing. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/