Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761199AbZATQD1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:03:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756253AbZATQDR (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:03:17 -0500 Received: from rtr.ca ([76.10.145.34]:55205 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755445AbZATQDQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:03:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4975F5C1.8090107@rtr.ca> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:03:13 -0500 From: Mark Lord Organization: Real-Time Remedies Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: IDE/ATA development list , Linux Kernel , Tejun Heo , Jeff Garzik , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: libata, devm_*, and MSI ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1705 Lines: 51 Tejun / Jeff, I am working on MSI support for sata_mv, and am trying to puzzle out exactly what the kernel expects for this. Looking at other drivers, both libata and otherwise, yields a variety of conflicting implementations. For starters, the MSI HOW-TO suggests that drivers must be careful to invoke pci_disable_msi() on module unload, but I don't see that happening anywhere in libata. Unless, Tejun, the devm_* routines automatically do this.. do they? Next, there's no mention of a need for invoking pci_intx() in the HOW-TO, yet some device drivers call it, and others do not. Eg. from ahci.c, we have this: if ((hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_NO_MSI) || pci_enable_msi(pdev)) pci_intx(pdev, 1); Which agrees with the existing code in sata_mv: if (msi && pci_enable_msi(pdev)) pci_intx(pdev, 1); Which seems to call pci_intx() only when MSI is *not* used. Fine. But then in sata_vsc.c, we do sort of the opposite: if (pci_enable_msi(pdev) == 0) pci_intx(pdev, 0); Either that one is wrong, or pci_intx() is unnecessary in all cases. Again, the MSI HOW-TO doesn't even mention this routine. Looking through the network drivers, it seems that some of them do the pci_intx(pdev,1) call for the cases where pci_enable_msi() fails, similar to ahci.c and sata_mv.c. But not all of them do that. Perhaps somebody from the PCI side of things might enlighten us all. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/