To: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Faulty seagate drives, are going to be blacklisted?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:30:28 +0100."
             <20090120163028.63efeb1a@diego-desktop>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
References: <20090120002923.065f24ca@diego-desktop> <85346.1232422345@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
            <20090120163028.63efeb1a@diego-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1232472247_95765P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:24:07 -0500
Message-ID: <125975.1232472247@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1090
Lines: 30

--==_Exmh_1232472247_95765P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:30:28 +0100, Diego Calleja said:
> Yeah, that's why I asked. Now that I think about it, it should probably be
> the HAL people who should add one of those desktop "bubbles" warning the
> users about the possible failure (they already do it for faulty batteries)

Probably a better approach, as long as we leave enough info visible in various
/sys files for HAL to figure it out - but I'm pretty sure we already do that...


--==_Exmh_1232472247_95765P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFJdgi3cC3lWbTT17ARAk0SAJ9Rs9SkFKYDPlNzOzSuB4oQZecC+gCfbQ8J
aRhyNEhtcJMvRK0WKD78ohg=
=9kAj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1232472247_95765P--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/