Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 14:17:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 14:16:55 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:30227 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 14:16:48 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 17:16:20 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Alexander Viro Cc: , "Eric S. Raymond" , , That Linux Guy , Nicolas Pitre Subject: That Linux Guy ,Re: Of Bundling, Dao and Cowardice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Alexander Viro wrote: > While we are at it, look what Rik is doing right now. He has > a huge patch pretty much rewriting (what a coincidence) VM. He had tried > to shove its previous incarnations into the tree whole-sale. Actually, Linus took it unexpectedly while I was away to Europe for conferences for 2 weeks. ;) I don't quite agree on the "more trouble" part either, in the end it is MUCH more trouble when a big blob of code gets integrated than when a series of small changes get applied one by one. regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/