Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758548AbZAUNrT (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:47:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753130AbZAUNrJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:47:09 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:53036 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752814AbZAUNrI (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:47:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:44:31 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" , Pavel Emelyanov , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] coda: alloc_upcall: s/task_pgrp_nr/task_pgrp_vnr/ Message-ID: <20090121134431.GA15457@redhat.com> References: <20090118073453.GA714@redhat.com> <20090121050311.GD15771@cs.cmu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090121050311.GD15771@cs.cmu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1622 Lines: 41 On 01/21, Jan Harkes wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 08:34:53AM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Needs an ack from maintaner, I do not know where coda_in_hdr->pgid is used. > > It is used to uniquely identify a process and any of it children during > conflict resolution. > > When a conflict is detected, all accesses to the inconsistent object are > blocked. A special resolver process is forked off by the cache manager > and this is run in a new process group and only accesses from processes > in this group are allowed. The resolver process (or any of it's children) > compare the conflicting replicas, and ideally resolve the inconsistency > after which normal accesses are unblocked. > > So yes this should not a per namespace thing, but also not a process > specific pid, the resolver forks off different helper processes > depending on the type of files that are involved in the conflict, i.e. > mbox files require different merge strategy compared to opendocument > files. OK, thanks, please ignore this patch then. > I'm not sure what you are trying to do. Please look at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123240297918186 And I'd like to kill task_pgrp_nr(). Can't alloc_upcall() use task_pgrp_nr_ns(current, &init_pid_ns) instead? This is equivalent. But if this pid_t is used in the user-space to identify the process, then I think Eric is right. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/