Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S292816AbSBQHWo>; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 02:22:44 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S292818AbSBQHWf>; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 02:22:35 -0500
Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]:55429 "EHLO
	waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S292817AbSBQHWV>; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 02:22:21 -0500
Message-Id: <200202161803.g1GI3F1n001286@tigger.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sard patch for 2.4 - again 
In-Reply-To: Message from Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com> 
   of "Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:42:42 EST." <200202151942.g1FJggl18232@devserv.devel.redhat.com> 
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:03:15 +0100
From: Horst von Brand <brand@jupiter.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com> said:

[...]

> The filename does not matter. If it sits in an RPM, then it
> is good for the version of base kernel that the RPM uses.
> I know for the fact that Stephen updated it for cooperation
> with add_gendisk/del_gendisk in 2.4.16, so the patch is
> maintained actively. I would not worry about it, it's a good
> patch.

Whenever I udpdate a patch for a newer base version in the RPMs I build for
my own amusement I take care to change to filename.
-- 
Horst von Brand			     http://counter.li.org # 22616
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/