Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756193AbZAVJHc (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:07:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753016AbZAVJHO (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:07:14 -0500 Received: from mxpdbe2.wincor-nixdorf.com ([80.154.98.130]:39799 "EHLO mxpdbe2.wincor-nixdorf.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752714AbZAVJHM (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:07:12 -0500 Message-ID: <49783679.8010005@wincor-nixdorf.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:03:53 +0100 From: Niels de Vos Organization: Wincor Nixdorf International User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tosoni CC: "'Michael Bramer'" , "'Alan Cox'" , "'Paulius Zaleckas'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/serial/8250_pci.c (add support for '8-port RS-232 MIC-3620 from advantech' References: <6E0880DF84464BF2AA0275ABFFCCDAF2@acksys.local> In-Reply-To: <6E0880DF84464BF2AA0275ABFFCCDAF2@acksys.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFEEE667096B364B681E561B2" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2009 09:06:51.0275 (UTC) FILETIME=[C35F3DB0:01C97C70] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1886 Lines: 54 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFEEE667096B364B681E561B2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tosoni wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:32:15PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: >>>>>> static struct pci_device_id serial_pci_tbl[] =3D { >>>>>> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADVANTECH, >> PCI_DEVICE_ID_ADVANTECH_PCI3620, >>>>>> + 0x3620, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, >>>> Why not use PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADVANTECH as PCI_SUBVENDOR_ID too? >>> The Advantech vendor id is not 0x3620. This confused me as >> well which is >>> why I asked for an lspci. Advantech has stuck the device id in the >>> subvendor bits and '1' in the subdevice (so it should be 1 not >>> PCI_ANY_ID). >> is this better? >> >> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADVANTECH, >> PCI_DEVICE_ID_ADVANTECH_PCI3620, >> + PCI_DEVICE_ID_ADVANTECH_PCI3620, 1, 0, 0, >=20 > Since the name describes a device id where it should be a (sub)vendor i= d, > I would suggest that you add a line of comment to explain the case. > So that no one will be tempted to change it back to PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADVAN= TECH > in the future. Definitely! Niels --------------enigFEEE667096B364B681E561B2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJeDZ55KAkGQPO/QoRAhWlAKDfr/kTM19Nf5amrlEVFpaadxB50QCeMehC 6XE0CeYNWP2iAam1+/dYRSA= =lf7o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFEEE667096B364B681E561B2-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/