Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756189AbZAVKvx (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:51:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752318AbZAVKvo (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:51:44 -0500 Received: from hapkido.dreamhost.com ([66.33.216.122]:55913 "EHLO hapkido.dreamhost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752017AbZAVKvn (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:51:43 -0500 Message-ID: <49784F79.1070905@hiramoto.org> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:50:33 +0100 From: Karl Hiramoto User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090102) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_=C1ngel_=C1lvarez?= Cc: Krzysztof Halasa , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IXP4XX queues References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 866 Lines: 28 Miguel ?ngel ?lvarez wrote: > Hi > > Last December we talked about 64 queues and IXP4XX. Karl has a patch > for them, and although I think it could be better to splitt it into > two different ones ("plain 64 queue expansion" for which I proposed a > modified patch based on Karl's, and "debugging and other things"), I > prefer Karl's to none. > > What do you think of this? Which should be the best way to include it > in the main stream kernel? > > Thanks > > Miguel ?ngel > > The patch needs minor rework so it applies cleanly against 2.6.29-rc2 at the moment i don't have time to do this and test it. -- Karl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/