Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 05:35:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 05:35:06 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:26191 "EHLO frodo.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 05:34:58 -0500 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Linux-Kernel list Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] Merge e1000 gigabit driver (yay) In-Reply-To: <3C6E2F92.FD196E71@mandrakesoft.com> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 18 Feb 2002 03:30:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: <3C6E2F92.FD196E71@mandrakesoft.com> Message-ID: Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik writes: > Linus, > > I'm pleased to submit to you a BK merge of Intel's e1000 driver. The > license is now "GPL or (BSD + patent grant)", which should satisfy those > concerns. Nice progress. > I would also like to publicly thank Intel for this work. The two > contributors listed have been very responsive to feedback, and they have > put a good deal of work into beating the driver into shape for a kernel > merge. > > Now I just hope I can convince them to open up their hardware specs :) This is almost as important. Currently this greatly reduces the value of their hardware as it places stumbling blocks in road of distributed debugging. And the fewer eyes the deeper the bugs. For that reason the company I work for has been looking for alternatives to Intel's network cards. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/