Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754008AbZAVQoo (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:44:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754762AbZAVQoR (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:44:17 -0500 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([141.211.133.115]:56754 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754662AbZAVQoQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:44:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:44:09 -0500 To: Ian Campbell Cc: Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Max Kellermann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcosta@redhat.com, Grant Coady , Tom Tucker Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds" Message-ID: <20090122164409.GB13129@fieldses.org> References: <1228169383.20370.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1228565812.10856.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1229279045.3721.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081216175503.GG16388@fieldses.org> <1229452775.3721.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090107222115.GI965@fieldses.org> <20090108182003.GB17623@fieldses.org> <1231449753.21688.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090108212605.GG19312@fieldses.org> <1232612860.29604.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1232612860.29604.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1379 Lines: 37 On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 08:27:40AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:26 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > > > (Merged now, so testing mainline as of today should work too.) > > > > > > The server isn't really a machine I want to test random kernels on, > > is > > > there some subset of those changesets which it would be useful for > > me to > > > pull back onto the 2.6.26 kernel I'm using to test? (I can most like > > > manage the backporting myself). > > > > > > These two look like the relevant ones to me but I'm not sure: > > > 22945e4a1c7454c97f5d8aee1ef526c83fef3223 svc: Clean up deferred > > requests on transport destruction > > > 69b6ba3712b796a66595cfaf0a5ab4dfe1cf964a SUNRPC: Ensure the server > > closes sockets in a timely fashion > > > > > > I think 69b6 was in the set of three I tested previously and the > > other > > > two turned into 2294? > > > > Yep, exactly.--b. > > The client machine now has an uptime of ten days without error after > these two patches were applied to the server. > > Thanks everybody, Very good, so upstream should be OK. Thanks for the testing! --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/