Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S293498AbSBRBwz>; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 20:52:55 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S293499AbSBRBwp>; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 20:52:45 -0500
Received: from ns0.auctionwatch.com ([66.7.130.2]:29450 "EHLO
	whitestar.auctionwatch.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S293498AbSBRBwf>; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 20:52:35 -0500
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 17:52:34 -0800
From: Petro <petro@auctionwatch.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Eepro100 driver.
Message-ID: <20020218015234.GA6113@auctionwatch.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020213211639.GB2742@auctionwatch.com> <3C6B2277.CA9A0BF8@mandrakesoft.com> <3C6B406E.1010706@candelatech.com> <3C6B4B20.FE4AE960@mandrakesoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C6B4B20.FE4AE960@mandrakesoft.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:29:04AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Long term, it is going to be replaced with e100 from Intel, as soon as
> > > that driver is in good shape.
> > Any ETA on that?  (Make them really support the ethtool IOCTLs first :))
> Soon but not terribly soon.  Intel has been responsive to feedback from
> Andrew Morton and myself.  Once it passes our review and Intel's
> testing, it will go in.  eepro100 will live on for a while, until we are
> certain e100 is stable, though.  (and eepro100 won't disappear from 2.4
> at all)

    So what do you suggest people like Mr. Greear and I do in the mean
    time?

-- 
Share and Enjoy. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/