Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758771AbZAVUDc (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:03:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754527AbZAVUDX (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:03:23 -0500 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:41588 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754321AbZAVUDX (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:03:23 -0500 Subject: Re: System clock runs too fast after 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28.1 upgrade From: john stultz To: Miklos Vajna Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Gabriel C , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?CS=C9CSY_L=E1szl=F3?= In-Reply-To: <20090122195132.GZ21473@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <20090121171423.GI21473@genesis.frugalware.org> <1f1b08da0901211200l88fa89s78a51c4e90878d85@mail.gmail.com> <20090121210726.GK21473@genesis.frugalware.org> <1232573646.6997.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090122195132.GZ21473@genesis.frugalware.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:03:14 -0800 Message-Id: <1232654594.6678.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1408 Lines: 35 On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 20:51 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:34:06PM -0800, john stultz wrote: > > Miklos: Can you try bisecting this down some? > > I did it two times when I finally realised that it depends on the > config. So currently I have two config files, with "-good" the clock is > fine, with "-bad" it's too fast. Could you send the same info I requested before (available_clocksources, current_clocksource, dmesg) for both good and bad configs? Also make sure they're on the same kernel version (as the configs are from slightly different kernel versions). > Of course the diff contains unrelated changes as well, I'm trying to > find which one is the problematic one. Bisecting the config difference is probably the most reliable way, but you might try some shots in the dark first: CONFIG_X86_VISWS: If I recall, this is support for SGI workstations that had different apics then most systems, and might be related. CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST: I really haven't been paying much attention to the paravirt bits, but this has some clock related subconfig options that might be affecting it. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/