Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755122AbZAVV7e (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:59:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752039AbZAVV7X (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:59:23 -0500 Received: from acsinet12.oracle.com ([141.146.126.234]:39553 "EHLO acsinet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751600AbZAVV7V (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:59:21 -0500 Message-ID: <4978EBE1.9080403@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:57:53 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Jones , Greg KH , Ingo Molnar , Geert Uytterhoeven , Andrew Morton , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?= , David Brown , Phil Oester , Kay Sievers , Phillip Lougher , Christoph Hellwig , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29 References: <20090109165422.GF24884@logfs.org> <20090109193738.GA9827@linode.davidb.org> <20090109211937.GA14342@logfs.org> <20090110124335.GB30744@elte.hu> <20090110165033.GA23943@logfs.org> <20090110101235.7ca24c44.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090110221528.GA31774@elte.hu> <20090111153920.GC7401@elte.hu> <20090111163018.GA9300@suse.de> <20090122215041.GA29369@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20090122215041.GA29369@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsmt702.oracle.com [141.146.40.80] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090201.4978EBF4.0033:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2903 Lines: 63 Dave Jones wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 08:30:18AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > I was wanting to stick with drivers to start with, but I really have no > > objection to adding filesystems, if they are self-contained, to the > > drivers/staging/ directory. > > > > I looked at adding squashfs, but at the time, it touched other portions > > of the kernel which wouldn't have made it a good canidate for staging. > > This was later resolved, and now that it is merged, it's a moot issue :) > > > > So, if anyone wants to send me filesystems, I'll be glad to take them > > into drivers/staging, as long as they are self-contained (novfs for > > example would fit this category.) > > Filesystems in staging worries me. > > * The number of people who competently review filesystem code > (and I mean real review here, not checkpatch & codingstyle crap) > is significantly less than those who review drivers. > I foresee stuff just lingering there for years. > (Look how long fs stuff hangs around unmerged in -mm for example). > > * The fallout of staging is already starting to drift into distros. > Within a week of Fedora shipping a kernel that had staging/ > we had requests to enable drivers from it. > And of course, those drivers were garbage. > This is only going to increase as time goes on. > > * For crap drivers that a minority cares about, this isn't a big deal > to tell the users "build it yourself, we don't support it when stuff breaks". > (And a lot of that crap will break. NetworkManager won't work properly > with some of the wireless crap in staging for example), but by > continually adding to the shitpile the potential for review dramatically > gets reduced, and for something as critical as a filesystem, I find this > absolutely terrifying from a support perspective. > > I don't mean to piss on your parade, but from my viewpoint, staging > is a trainwreck so far, and I'd hate to see it get worse. > > We've already demonstrated "look how much stuff we can merge" time and > time again, but no-one ever seems to have a proposal for how we increase > the amount of review code gets before it's merged. > > There's lowering the barrier for entry, and there's not having a barrier at all. > The latter is what I'm concerned that staging/ has become. I agree. Alexey D. asked about that a few days ago and the Greg's answer about what he would accept was "anything". Ugh ugh ugh. I did not like that reply at all. I agree that crap is the right name for lots of it. For the ones that people & distros care about, someone should step up and do some real work on them. ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/